Use cases

Every ticket type, covered

From brand-new features to the regression debt no one has time for — here's how QEPilot clears the work that piles up in a QA backlog.

New feature tickets

The problem

A feature ticket is groomed but sits in the QA backlog for days before anyone writes cases for it.

With QEPilot

QEPilot drafts manual test cases the same day the ticket is groomed — mapped to each acceptance criterion — then ships the approved ones as Playwright specs.

Regression bugs

The problem

A bug is fixed, but no regression test is added, so it quietly comes back two releases later.

With QEPilot

QEPilot turns the fix into a traceable manual case and a Playwright spec wired into CI, so the same regression is caught automatically on every future PR.

Ambiguous specs

The problem

Acceptance criteria are vague ("export large files"), and testers either guess or stall.

With QEPilot

Instead of guessing, QEPilot flags the ambiguity on the ticket and asks — the same thing a careful human QA engineer would do — before writing a case on an assumption.

Legacy test debt

The problem

Whole areas of the product have no automated coverage, and no one has time to backfill it.

With QEPilot

Point QEPilot at existing tickets and specs; it works through them steadily, drafting reviewable cases and automating the approved ones without a dedicated project.

Ready to ship tested features faster?

Send me a Jira ticket and I'll show you the manual test cases and Playwright automation it turns into — no commitment required.

Start a project